The real problems in an SSAE 16 data center may be the ones you don’t see.
The reason is that SSAE 16 compliance takes different forms, financial and operational. These two areas are different, and compliance in each one is not interchangeable with the other.
SSAE 16, also called “Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements 16,” was created by the Auditing Standards Board (part of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants). It follows on from the earlier SAS (Statement on Auditing Standards) 70.
In general, it defines how service companies report on compliance. For an SSAE 16 data center, it gives assurances to customers about standards adhered to by that data center. But what kind of assurances?
SSAE exists in different versions for data centers or other service organizations. The ones most commonly used are SOC (Service Organization Controls) 1 and SOC 2.
For an objective measure of how well a data center provides an operational solution, the fullest report is the SSAE 16 SOC 2 Type 2. This is the guarantee that a data center will perform to expectations in areas such as:
If a data center cannot satisfy customers on the important Trust Services Principles, this is an issue.
Whether or not real problems and damage occur, the risk alone already has an impact. It can prevent customers from fulfilling their own compliance obligations or put their own business goals in jeopardy. In the absence of a statement about SSAE 16 SOC 2 compliance, customers cannot tell if there will potentially be problems or not.
A data center that is audited and found to fall short on one or more of the Trust Services Principles cannot claim compliance with those principles. However, it can work to improve its resources and processes to achieve audited compliance as an SSAE 16 data center afterward.
How do you rate SSAE 16 compliance compared to that of other standards, like ISO 27001? Give us your point of view in the space for comments below.
Also, see Top 5 SSAE 16 Problems Faced by Data Center CEOs.